Clearer ownership. Better‑connected care transitions.

Start with public data, then examine a handoff across care departments and facilities with your team. Lime Health helps you identify gaps, test an improvement and keep track of responsibilities, follow-up and completion.

See your facility’s results in context

Bring the views together

Read reported results beside descriptive state comparisons and related inpatient service activity.

Make the interpretation checkable

See source periods, missing information and the limits of each comparison.

Focus the review

Use a facility summary to check which part of the workflow warrants closer examination with your team.

From a pattern to a useful question

For heart failure, a starting question might be: “When a patient leaves the hospital after treatment for heart failure, how does your team confirm the first follow-up happened, and how is it picked up when it hasn’t?”

The team may already have a reliable answer. The purpose is to learn what is useful, correct what is wrong and decide whether anything needs review.

Keep the work visible across teams

For a workflow developed with your team, connect each handoff to an owner, its current status, follow-up and a record of completion or an unresolved exception. Retain the supporting records and changes so colleagues can understand what happened without reconstructing the work from separate messages.

The intended workflow record works alongside your existing systems. Its scope, information and operating responsibilities are agreed with your team before implementation.

Your perspective

Clinical leader

Does the interpretation reflect how care is delivered?

Care-transition leader

How is the next handoff accepted and followed through?

Quality and readmissions leader

Which reported results deserve a closer look?

Finance leader

What would make a change worth discussing?

Executive leader

Which teams need to agree on the next step?

IT, data and security leader

What information and access would the work require?

Data coverage

Available in the review portal

HRRP facility context and comparisons, related inpatient activity, historical payment context, selected MSSP/ACO and ACCESS research, and supporting public sources.

Under review

TEAM and TCM research, plus separately validated FY2027 HRRP candidates. These are not current integrated facility projections.

Coverage varies by source, facility and reporting period. Published Medicare counts are partial; missing is not zero. Program participation does not establish a referral relationship.

Sources, periods and data limits →

Explore without a service commitment

You can request a facility brief or a guided walkthrough today. Individual portal accounts and a shared online workspace are not available through this website. Further review and workflow services require a separately agreed scope and readiness.